The purpose of this website is to be a place for learning and discussion. The website and each tutorial topics do not encourage anyone to participate in trading or investment of any kind.
Any information shown in any part of this website do not promise any movement, gains, or profit for any trader or non-trader.

.

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: MarkFengZhi
« on: February 11, 2019, 12:02:18 AM »

贝索斯:别拿特朗普勒索我

天使不投资人





                   
亚马逊CEO贝索斯昨天发布的一篇博客文章让整个美国炸了锅。

当贝索斯宣布离婚时,这位首富对婚外情相对体面的处理方法就引来不少围观和赞叹。没想到这事儿没完,直到今天,还有人拿婚外情做文章——比如发邮件勒索贝索斯的AMI(American Media Inc,美国媒体公司)。

婚外情照片勒索?未免晚了一步

在贝索斯公开的邮件全文中,我们可以看到AMI提出了一个交易:让贝索斯发布一个声明,来避免AMI发布一些含有猥亵内容的贝索斯婚外情照片。

AMI的诉求是:要求贝索斯声明“没有任何根据表明AMI的报道是出于政治动机或受到政治力量的影响”。

这个诉求未免令围观群众云里雾里,八卦猛料和政治又有啥关系?但婚外情照片可确实非常有杀伤力。

这些照片的内容围绕贝索斯和他的婚外情对象,前电视节目主持人Lauren Sanchez。AMI的邮件虽然并未直接发出照片,但采用了更猥琐的文字描述方式来阐述照片内容:包括但不限于衣着暴露、裸体、生殖器乃至性相关的行为。

由于照片内容确实比较“私密”,即便在贝索斯已经离婚的今天,也算得上另一种层面的“猛料”了。而且AMI也不是什么八卦小报,而是拥有采访特权的大媒体,影响力绝非闹着玩。

幸运的是贝索斯将婚外情事件处理得比较体面,甚至得到了一些赞誉,因此这些照片虽然危害其隐私,却不会太影响其声誉。可以想象,如果在贝索斯自己宣布离婚前AMI拿这些内容勒索,恐怕贝索斯是很难这样站出来“英勇对抗”的。

跟政治又有啥关系?

那么回到声明本身:声明内容是个啥意思,这事儿怎么摊上政治了?


不仅发送邮件给贝索斯的AMI首席内容官霍华德是个媒体人,某种意义上贝索斯也是。别忘了,2013年,贝索斯用2.5亿美元收购了垂垂老矣的著名左派媒体《华盛顿邮报》,并在之后的两年通过网络和新媒体为其注入活力,让这个差点凉了的老媒体重换新生,至今仍稳居美国左派媒体的代表之一。


而《华盛顿邮报》正打算报道一些关于AMI的丑事。具体来说,是AMI旗下的杂志《National Enquirer》(对,就是那个之前一直捅贝索斯婚外情八卦的杂志)。

贝索斯称,他们掌握了一些材料,能证明National Enquirer获得了一些“采访特权”,与美国司法部乃至特朗普本人存在特殊交易,有成为政治宣传工具的嫌疑。

我们都懂,虽然每家媒体都有政治立场也多少背负着政治使命(无论背后是执政党还是反对党),但这是一个“立场问题”,而不是具体的操作问题。如果媒体真的把内容报道和政治宣传混为一谈,那对媒体和记者、编辑个人而言都是十足的丑闻,会极大伤害媒体的公信力。

贝索斯提到:“在特朗普先生成为总统后,他通过白宫晚宴奖励Pecker先生(National Enquirer负责人)的忠诚,媒体主管带来了一位与沙特阿拉伯皇室成员有重要关系的客人。当时,Pecker先生在那里开展业务,同时还寻求收购融资......“

贝索斯说,Pecker是特朗普个人的朋友。不久前,AMI还因为接受政治献金对特朗普某丑闻保持沉默而涉嫌违反竞选财务法,但其通过与美国政府的合作而逃避了相关指控。种种迹象正在表面,AMI有沦为特朗普政治工具的可能。

而华盛顿邮报作为一个积极“反特朗普”的左派媒体自然不会放过这一机会。简单来说,贝索斯控制的华盛顿邮报要搞AMI,AMI才不得不用猥亵照片这种下作的勒索手段来“劝阻”——没想到碰了贝索斯的硬钉子。

这下我们也可以理解为啥一个首富照片就能震动美国各大媒体头条了——贝索斯恐怕倒是其次,关键是,这又是骂特朗普的大好机会。

哎,美国媒体也是水深火热啊。
                                           
                                                   

                           

                               
*文章为作者独立观点,不代表虎嗅网立场


                                                           
 

Source: 贝索斯:别拿特朗普勒索我

-

Discussion Forum / 论坛 / منتدى للنقاش/ Diễn đàn thảo luận/

-
Disclaimer : The purpose of this website is to be a place for learning and discussion. The website and each tutorial topics do not encourage anyone to participate in trading or investment of any kind. Any information shown in any part of this website do not promise any movement, gains, or profit for any trader or non-trader.

By viewing any material or using the information within this site, you agree that it is general educational material whether it is about learning trading online or not and you will not hold anybody responsible for loss or damages resulting from the content provided here. It doesn't matter if this website contain a materials related to any trading. Investing in financial product is subject to market risk. Financial products, such as stock, forex, commodity, and cryptocurrency, are known to be very speculative and any investment or something related in them should done carefully, desirably with a good personal risk management.

Prices movement in the past and past performance of certain traders are by no means an assurance of future performance or any stock, forex, commodity, or cryptocurrency market movement. This website is for informative and discussion purpose in this website only. Whether newbie in trading, part-time traders, or full time traders. No one here can makes no warranties or guarantees in respect of the content, whether it is about the trading or not. Discussion content reflects the views of individual people only. The website bears no responsibility for the accuracy of forum member’s comments whether about learning forex online or not and will bear no responsibility or legal liability for discussion postings.

Any tutorial, opinions and comments presented on this website do not represent the opinions on who should buy, sell or hold particular investments, stock, forex currency pairs, commodity, or any products or courses. Everyone should conduct their own independent research before making any decision.

The publications herein do not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. You should obtain individual trading advice based on your own particular circumstances before making an investment decision on the basis of information about trading and other matter on this website.

As a user, you should agree, through acceptance of these terms and conditions, that you should not use this forum to post any content which is abusive, vulgar, hateful, and harassing to any traders and non-traders.